In 1997, Michael Haneke made a
psycho thriller called Funny Games that exhorted the audience to leave
the cinema and then told those who remained that they were culpable for the
suffering onscreen. Then in 2009, Yorgos Lanthimos made Dogtooth, a film
that seemed to be cashing-in on the Josef Fritzl scandal (though the script was
written before the story came out) but which primarily blamed the family and
the façades of bourgeois normality that we all put up. Now comes Alexandros
Avranas’ Miss Violence, which deals with suicide, incest and paedophilia
but without any real intellectual weight or compassion for the victims. And as
always, the complacent viewer and their bourgeois lifestyle are the real
villains.
On the day of her birthday,
eleven year-old Angeliki (Chloe Bolota) commits suicide by wordlessly jumping
out of a window during the family celebrations. The rest of the family –
including the domineering Father (Themis Panou) and the silent mother Eleni
(Eleni Roussinou) – claim not to know why she did this horrible thing, but as
the film plays out, the horrors of this dysfunctional family are laid bare.
The film builds slowly following
the suicide. We are invited into this family’s home (the film begins with a
door opening and ends with a door being locked to emphasise our entry into a
private sphere) and we slowly pick up on certain incongruities and oddities.
Father is strict, domineering and unwavering in his rule. When he leaves the
room, everyone sits in silence waiting uneasily for his return. The film is
ultimately about control and how everyone loses when someone enforces their
will. Or something like that – the film and the director are not entirely clear
on this point, beyond a few short scenes that could be interpreted as socially
aware in which Father tries to keep a demeaning job. It is a dishonest film
because, I suspect, none of this stuff really keeps Avranas awake at night.
Ultimately, Miss Violence
is a hopelessly misguided work. Avranas tells the story with long, steady
takes, the look of intellectual cinema, but it seems like only a mere gesture.
To me, his film is little more than a series of shock tactics intended only to
enhance the director’s international reputation – a gambit that proved doubly
successful when one considers the film’s two top awards from the Venice Film
Festival.
There is no intellectual weight
to match the intellectual look, only surface imitations of previous films.
Characters stare out at the audience to suggest their complicity in moments
straight out of Funny Games. One horrible scene in which a paedophile
leads away a small girl in order to rape her (in one long take following
relentlessly behind as the child is lead away) is followed by a scene in which
Mother (Reni Pittaki) looks directly at the camera and, by implication, tells
the audience to go back to sleep – as if the audience, having been confronted
with the brutal, indigestible facts of modern society, must forget about what
they have seen in order to continue being entertained. Equally foolish is the
director’s insistence that the victim is as violent as the victimiser – as
ridiculous a statement as it is badly made. Add to this the wholly inhuman
performances and the heartless, exploitative representations of abuse and we
have an incredibly stupid film that is little more than an exercise in cynical
cruelty.
When one looks at these kinds of films – in which
horrible acts of violence and extreme suffering are shown in gleefully explicit
detail, carefully choreographed, shot and edited for maximum effect (rewatch
the opening to this film, or the shock gang rape scene with this in mind) only
for the end result to be not a film that deals compassionately with suffering
or honestly with violence but a meta-fictional critique of the audience and
what they get out of this kind of film. However, with films like Funny Games,
Dogtooth, Amour and now Miss Violence one should wonder if
it really is the audience or the bourgeoisie or the family that is to blame and
not the filmmaker themselves. Or maybe it is an arthouse market in which a
taboo breaking, boundary-stretching cinema of cruelty is the only kind that
breaks into foreign markets. Either way it seems like a cinematic dead-end, and
in the case of Miss Violence, with its exploitative use of sexual abuse
and paedophilia for its own uses, it is as bad and as insensitive as a rape
joke.
A shorter review is available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment